tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36284819.post1351747282161800218..comments2024-03-09T10:58:56.668+02:00Comments on constitutionally speaking: But photocopying does not pay as well...Pierre de Voshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17861888910368295788noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36284819.post-76933432672073103252007-04-07T21:55:00.000+02:002007-04-07T21:55:00.000+02:00I wonder if I can lay some charges that’ll put my ...I wonder if I can lay some charges that’ll put my parents away for twenty, seeing they repeatedly forced me to eat dinner in years gone by. Seeing I’m back from a little “consensual dinner”, I thought to add a little more…<BR/><BR/>Now, on to the issue: on your bigoted, closed-minded, fundamentalist super-left wing blog, you've equated sex to an amoral activity.<BR/><BR/>What then, is moral? Loving the hot Italian intern with the firm butt? Condemning Bush? Hanging the "homophobe"?<BR/><BR/>I'm sorry, but I cannot accept what you say about sex, as you proclaim your deviance from the blog-tops. Before you label me as a homophobe christianist, let me lay out my logic on homosexuality:<BR/>Being fag is deviant, simply because it deviates from nature - the plumbing don't work, buddy... Sex is about procreation, not orgasm. Sure, that's a healthy and happy motivation, but it's not the point. Discovery has a little about how the rest of the creatures do it. Watch 'n learn.<BR/><BR/>Reading your post provides endless amusement about the strange ends of your mind:<BR/><BR/>"... one believes the state has a duty to enforce the moral views of one section of the community on all of us – regardless of the consequences to others."<BR/><BR/>Isn't it strange that a liberal, pro-homo-morality is determining the sway of law in our conservative country? The small but ridiculously loud homosexual community is making its duty to enforce homosexual ideologies about sex in our schools, universities, media... and constitution - regardless of the consequences to others. I have a nagging suspicion that homosexual rights have pushed through despite resistance by the public in South Africa (e.g. 95% voted against gay marriage during the country-wide tour to "feel the temperament of the people on the issue" but it still got passed) is because most of our leaders are ex-inmates.<BR/><BR/>South Africa is conservative, it holds to traditional values – wake up and smell the boerewors!<BR/><BR/>"The christianists may not agree with me, but they can’t say this view is not based on a kind of reasoning. It is just not the kind of reasoning that they like."<BR/><BR/>The liberalist is saying that sex is amoral. Then goes on to say that sexual harassment should be condemned. I don't like this reason, because it is flawed, obtuse and tepid.<BR/><BR/>I'm not disagreeing with you because I'm a "christianist", whatever that is, I disagree because I find it reprehensible that a person who could spew a slew of idiocy like this could be called a professor! <BR/><BR/>Look mama, the law professor has no clothes!RatXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03463877062483508164noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36284819.post-10102804138619014762007-04-07T18:52:00.000+02:002007-04-07T18:52:00.000+02:00"Having sex is morally no different from having di..."Having sex is morally no different from having dinner..."<BR/><BR/>Wow. No wonder rapists face less and less jail time. Soon, it'll be tantamount to forcing someone to eat dinner with you. As a professor of law, you've become very disillusioned with the concept of law, which in its very concept is the upholding of a form of morality (look up the word "moral" sometime, you may learn something).<BR/><BR/>The reason you ascribe to is either missing, or so deeply flawed it's as water-tight as a spagetti-strainer.<BR/><BR/>Seems like you're a professor because the court won't have you - they adhere to reason.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com