Unlikeable Mr. Roberts fit to write a biography?
I am not a great fan of Mr. Roberts and have written on this Blog about his unfortunate defamation case, but I suspect he is correct when he predicts that the liberal white establishment is going to pull the book to pieces for all the wrong reasons.
One oddity of the book is that very little of it is taken up with documenting and elucidating Mbeki's own views, which do not seem to be of particular interest to the author. It is divided instead between "a theoretical dogfight in ideological outer space" (as Rian Malan put it) and vindictive attacks on Mbeki's critics and opponents. At one stage Roberts writes (p. 125) that The Discourses by Niccolò Machiavelli's are what really "illuminates Mbeki's statesmanship." Yet, in that work Machiavelli advised:
I hold it to be a proof of great prudence for men to abstain from threats and insulting words towards any one, for neither the one nor the other in any way diminishes the strength of the enemy; but the one makes him more cautious, and the other increases his hatred of you, and makes him more persevering in his efforts to injure you.
"It is the duty", Machiavelli continued, "of every good general or chief of a republic, to use all proper means to prevent such insults and reproaches from being indulged in by citizens or soldiers." This is advice the presidency has clearly chosen to ignore. By supporting this project, in the way that they did, the presidency were clearly hoping to buttress Mbeki's position, both morally and politically. Yet they may find that this book - which manages to direct "harsh sarcasms" against so many different people - has precisely the opposite effect intended.
2 comments:
You said at the beginning:
“I bought Ronald Suresh Roberts' biography of President Thabo Mbeki today. Called Fit to Govern: The Native Intelligence of Thabo Mbeki, the book contains a spirited defence of Mbeki and even more spirited or even vituperative attacks on many of Mbeki's (and Roberts') critics. ………..
…………………..I am very much looking forward to read the book because I am rather confident it won't be boring. “
However, you ended:
“……………After reading more of the book, I will weigh in with my own two cents worth.”
Where did you get the idea that the book contains a “spirited defence………..” etc. prior to reading………did you do some psychic reading?
Congratulations you contributed to the many words…..quite interesting indeed!
My assumption that the book contains a spirited defense of Mbeki is based on the two reviews of the book I have read (to which I link in the piece), many press reports and my reading of the first two chapters which seemed to confirm that aspect of the reviews. But I obviously do not want to give a definitive view of the book until I have read the whole thing...
Post a Comment